A federal district court judge in Missoula has ruled the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must reconsider whether to list Montana's Arctic grayling population under the Endangered Species Act.

The agency argued the listing is not warranted. The court's action was in response to a lawsuit brought by a coalition of advocacy groups.

There are six grayling fish species in the Northern Hemisphere, but the colorful Arctic grayling is the only one found in North America and is already extinct in Michigan.

Patrick Kelly, Montana and Washington director for the Western Watersheds Project, part of the coalition suing the agency, said the grayling faces an uphill environmental battle.

"The elephant in the room here with a fish that is very dependent on cold water is climate change, and heat waves and drought, and everything associated with this human-caused phenomenon," Kelly explained.

The court order said the Fish and Wildlife Service has a year to make a new determination on the Arctic grayling. The battle over the fish began in 1991, but the agency contended based on its best science, the fish should not be added to the Endangered Species List.

Kelly pointed out the grayling have continued to face population decline and habitat degradation as the climate changes. He noted the West has faced some of the hottest weather on record and there have been huge stream closures on key rivers where grayling live.

"They're struggling and they have been for a long time," Kelly emphasized. "That's why this is such an important decision, because it's yet another chance, hopefully, for the agency to do the right thing and list this fish, so it can be protected and recovered under the Endangered Species Act."

Protection would require a federal recovery plan to address chronic low water flows in Montana's iconic Big Hole River, among other steps.


get more stories like this via email

The National Park Service faces at least two lawsuits for its latest bison management plan for Yellowstone National Park, the first update released in about 25 years.

The new plan allows for a slightly larger bison population in the park, between 3,500 and 6,000 animals, as well as more space for them to roam and increased capacity for people to hunt them.

The State of Montana is suing, alleging a lack of cooperation in planning. The conservation group Alliance for the Wild Rockies is also suing.

Mike Garrity, executive director of the alliance said, the plan's Environmental Impact Statement does not follow the most current science.

"We want the Park Service to do a new EIS that is honest," Garrity emphasized. "Then we could have an intelligent discussion and debate about wild bison."

The plan aims to prevent the spread of brucellosis, a bacterial disease that can lower birth rates in cattle, which is a priority for local ranchers. A report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine showed all recent cases of the disease in cattle were transmitted by wild elk, not bison.

The Park Service plan received some praise for incorporating the Bison Conservation Transfer Program, which relocates some healthy animals to tribal nations across the U.S. but Garrity argued the plan needs work around hunting protocols, which lead to intensive hunting in one gulch which acts as a migration bottleneck.

"Hunters are just lining up and it's become a shooting gallery," Garrity explained. "It's not a 'fair chase' hunt."

Both the Alliance lawsuit and the state's will be heard in Montana's Billings Division U.S. District Court.

Friday is Endangered Species Day and experts are reminding Rhode Islanders of the plight of the North Atlantic right whale.

Right whales' habitat is off the Eastern Seaboard, where they stay close to the coast. They are slow moving and feed near the surface, and those factors, plus their high blubber content, once made them an ideal target for whalers. They were hunted to the brink of extinction before commercial whaling was banned in 1937.

Jane Davenport, senior attorney at the Biodiversity Law Center for the nonprofit conservation group Defenders of Wildlife, said they remain critically endangered.

"Human activities are killing off right whales unintentionally, via fishing gear entanglements and ship strikes, and those have the same effect as killing right whales by harpooning," Davenport pointed out. "They are reducing the population to the point where its survival is in question."

Current estimates place the right whale population around 370, with fewer than 70 females of reproductive age.

Right whales can be hard to spot, as they travel underwater, their backs are black and they have no dorsal fin. In 2008, NOAA Fisheries established seasonal speed zones, but only for vessels over 65 feet in length.

After new research, NOAA proposed amending the rule in 2022, applying it to vessels over 35 feet. The proposal was withdrawn in January but Davenport argued the expanded regulation is practical and necessary.

"If we slow boats down only in limited times and places during the year, it's not year-round, it's not everywhere," Davenport explained. "We need to have slow speed zones, just like we have slow speed zones around schools, twice a day during school days, during the school year."

Right whales feed on tiny crustaceans. Like other whales, their waste is an important part of the ocean ecosystem, as fertilizer promoting the growth of phytoplankton, which is the base of the marine food web. It is estimated phytoplankton are responsible for around half of the oxygen in the earth's atmosphere.

Davenport added despite the challenges, it is still possible to save the whales.

"We can coexist, and if we can coexist, we can allow the right whale to recover," Davenport stressed. "It is not too late. We have not passed the point of no return."


get more stories like this via email

Today, on the 20th anniversary of Endangered Species Day, conservation advocates warn polices of President Donald Trump's administration are undermining efforts to save animals and plants important to California ecosystems.

Trump's Department of the Interior wants to redefine the word "harm" to remove protection from habitat destruction in deciding which species are at risk.

Susan Holmes, executive director of the Endangered Species Coalition, noted the public comment period for the proposed change ends Monday.

"The number one reason that endangered species become endangered is the destruction of habitat," Holmes pointed out. "The proposals coming from the Trump administration would make it impossible to protect the habitat that wildlife and endangered species depend on."

Trump appointees have also proposed huge budget cuts to agencies overseeing wildlife protection and to environmental research, saying they no longer align with administration priorities.

In California, 178 animals and 290 plants are listed as either endangered or threatened, or are candidates for listing.

Many local events are planned for Endangered Species Day, including programs at Dos Rios State Park and the Cabrillo Marine Aquarium.

Holmes emphasized it is a good time to celebrate the incredible progress the country has made to reestablish species like the gray wolf.

"In California, we've seen species that were on the brink of extinction coming back, including the California condor and the California sea otter," Holmes outlined. "It is really exciting to see people working in communities to recover some of these species."

Also on Monday, the public comment period ends for a proposal to list the monarch butterfly as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act.