CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Conservationists are warning that riders attached to the Farm Bill making its way through Congress could damage the nation's public lands and wildlife.

After a House version of the Farm Bill stalled last month, the Senate has proposed a bill that would exempt the livestock industry from a series of environmental reviews and public input. Erik Molvar, executive director of the Western Watersheds Project, said giving the green light to just any targeted grazing project, for example, could put rangelands at risk for wildfire.

"You could end up with some very harmful targeted grazing projects that could actually increase the amount of cheatgrass infestation,” Molvar said; “without even consulting the public about what's going on, on the lands that the public essentially owns."

Molvar noted that federal law requires agencies thoroughly research land-management issues and involve the public in decisions that affect public lands. But some members of Congress and the White House argue that cutting regulations that burden industry will lead to economic growth and job creation.

Molvar said if passed, the bill would sweep aside what he believes are common sense habitat protections. He added while the livestock industry might see increased profit margins if environmental rules are thrown out, exempting new infrastructure projects could end up blocking migration corridors for elk, mule deer and pronghorn.

Molvar said fencing in particular can be lethal to sage grouse, whose populations have declined by as much as 95 percent from historic levels.

"Barbed wire fences are guillotines for sage grouse, which are low-flying birds,” he explained. “And there's one study in western Wyoming that found that a single five-mile stretch of fence killed more than 100 sage grouse in the space of a year."

The House is expected to hold a re-vote on its version of the Farm Bill before June 22. This version includes a rider by Wyoming GOP Rep. Liz Cheney that would reopen vacant grazing lands to cattle, even in endangered species habitat.

The Senate's version could reach the full floor as early as next week.


get more stories like this via email

The National Park Service faces at least two lawsuits for its latest bison management plan for Yellowstone National Park, the first update released in about 25 years.

The new plan allows for a slightly larger bison population in the park, between 3,500 and 6,000 animals, as well as more space for them to roam and increased capacity for people to hunt them.

The State of Montana is suing, alleging a lack of cooperation in planning. The conservation group Alliance for the Wild Rockies is also suing.

Mike Garrity, executive director of the alliance said, the plan's Environmental Impact Statement does not follow the most current science.

"We want the Park Service to do a new EIS that is honest," Garrity emphasized. "Then we could have an intelligent discussion and debate about wild bison."

The plan aims to prevent the spread of brucellosis, a bacterial disease that can lower birth rates in cattle, which is a priority for local ranchers. A report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine showed all recent cases of the disease in cattle were transmitted by wild elk, not bison.

The Park Service plan received some praise for incorporating the Bison Conservation Transfer Program, which relocates some healthy animals to tribal nations across the U.S. but Garrity argued the plan needs work around hunting protocols, which lead to intensive hunting in one gulch which acts as a migration bottleneck.

"Hunters are just lining up and it's become a shooting gallery," Garrity explained. "It's not a 'fair chase' hunt."

Both the Alliance lawsuit and the state's will be heard in Montana's Billings Division U.S. District Court.

Friday is Endangered Species Day and experts are reminding Rhode Islanders of the plight of the North Atlantic right whale.

Right whales' habitat is off the Eastern Seaboard, where they stay close to the coast. They are slow moving and feed near the surface, and those factors, plus their high blubber content, once made them an ideal target for whalers. They were hunted to the brink of extinction before commercial whaling was banned in 1937.

Jane Davenport, senior attorney at the Biodiversity Law Center for the nonprofit conservation group Defenders of Wildlife, said they remain critically endangered.

"Human activities are killing off right whales unintentionally, via fishing gear entanglements and ship strikes, and those have the same effect as killing right whales by harpooning," Davenport pointed out. "They are reducing the population to the point where its survival is in question."

Current estimates place the right whale population around 370, with fewer than 70 females of reproductive age.

Right whales can be hard to spot, as they travel underwater, their backs are black and they have no dorsal fin. In 2008, NOAA Fisheries established seasonal speed zones, but only for vessels over 65 feet in length.

After new research, NOAA proposed amending the rule in 2022, applying it to vessels over 35 feet. The proposal was withdrawn in January but Davenport argued the expanded regulation is practical and necessary.

"If we slow boats down only in limited times and places during the year, it's not year-round, it's not everywhere," Davenport explained. "We need to have slow speed zones, just like we have slow speed zones around schools, twice a day during school days, during the school year."

Right whales feed on tiny crustaceans. Like other whales, their waste is an important part of the ocean ecosystem, as fertilizer promoting the growth of phytoplankton, which is the base of the marine food web. It is estimated phytoplankton are responsible for around half of the oxygen in the earth's atmosphere.

Davenport added despite the challenges, it is still possible to save the whales.

"We can coexist, and if we can coexist, we can allow the right whale to recover," Davenport stressed. "It is not too late. We have not passed the point of no return."


get more stories like this via email

Today, on the 20th anniversary of Endangered Species Day, conservation advocates warn polices of President Donald Trump's administration are undermining efforts to save animals and plants important to California ecosystems.

Trump's Department of the Interior wants to redefine the word "harm" to remove protection from habitat destruction in deciding which species are at risk.

Susan Holmes, executive director of the Endangered Species Coalition, noted the public comment period for the proposed change ends Monday.

"The number one reason that endangered species become endangered is the destruction of habitat," Holmes pointed out. "The proposals coming from the Trump administration would make it impossible to protect the habitat that wildlife and endangered species depend on."

Trump appointees have also proposed huge budget cuts to agencies overseeing wildlife protection and to environmental research, saying they no longer align with administration priorities.

In California, 178 animals and 290 plants are listed as either endangered or threatened, or are candidates for listing.

Many local events are planned for Endangered Species Day, including programs at Dos Rios State Park and the Cabrillo Marine Aquarium.

Holmes emphasized it is a good time to celebrate the incredible progress the country has made to reestablish species like the gray wolf.

"In California, we've seen species that were on the brink of extinction coming back, including the California condor and the California sea otter," Holmes outlined. "It is really exciting to see people working in communities to recover some of these species."

Also on Monday, the public comment period ends for a proposal to list the monarch butterfly as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act.